Often the terms simulation and emulation are used interchangeably. But, there is a distinct difference between emulators vs. simulotors. Both mimic the real thing in a virtual environment. However, the differences between emulation vs. simulation are quite big when it comes to mobile automation.
Đang xem: Emulator và simulator
NEW! The 2021 State of Test Automation >>
Keep reading to learn more about emulation vs. simulation.
Emulation vs. Simulation
When it comes to emulation vs. simulation, emulation duplicates while simulation replicates a real device. In a virtual environment, emulation imitates behavior closely. Simulation mimics behavior of a real device, but doesn’t necessarily match it exactly. Both are useful in app testing in addition to real devices.
What Are Simulators?
A simulator mimics the basic behavior of a device.
Simulators copy things from the real world into a virtual environment to give an idea about how that thing would work. It simulates the basic behavior but doesn’t necessarily follow all the rules of the real environment.
Mobile App Testing Strategy Combining Virtual and Real Devices
A simulator in mobile testing is also a virtual device. It allows you to test your app by simulating behavior of a real device.
What Are Emulators?
An emulator duplicates the thing exactly as it exists in real life.
Emulation is basically a complete imitation of the real thing. It just operates in a virtual environment instead of the real world.
Test Automation Strategy For Beginners >>
An emulator in mobile testing is a virtual device. It allows you to test your app by emulating a real device. A device emulator mimics the hardware or OS of the device.
Differences Between Emulation vs. SimulationCriteriaSimulationEmulation
Differences Between Emulation vs. Simulation
|Provided by||Device manufacturers and other companies.||Device manufacturers.|
|Target area||Internal behavior of the mobile device.||Mobile device hardware, software, and operating system.|
|Internal structure||Written in high-level language.||Written in machine-level assembly language.|
|Used/suitable for||Unit testing, automation testing.
Xem thêm: game rắn online
|Unit testing, automation testing, debugging.|
|Performance||Faster compared to emulators.||Slower due to latency since it involves binary translation.|
|Reliability||Low, as it cannot simulate all types of user interactions.||Same for emulation, as it cannot simulate all types of user interactions.|
Top 11 Challenges in Automated Testing & What to Do About Them >>
Emulation and simulation serve a very important goal during the SDLC. They greatly reduce costs to the developers and testers. Some would argue that they are faster to set up and execute, have lower error rates, and they are already embedded in the developer’s environment in most cases. This is very convenient from a fast feedback perspective.
The Complete Guide to Mobile Automation Testing >>
Emulation vs. Simulation: When Should You Use Them?
The best practice for mobile app testing should rely on a mix of tests. These tests should be spread across emulators, simulators, and real devices, based on the build phase.
In the early sprint phases, when the features are only shaping up, it makes a lot of sense to run smoke tests, unit tests, other types of testing and fast validations against emulators from the developer environment.
Mobile & Web Test Coverage Index >>
Later in the build process, when the test coverage requirements and the quality insights are greater, launching the full testing scope in parallel against real devices is the right way to go. You can also add real user conditions for a truer testing experience.
Get the Right Mix of Virtual and Real Platforms
Virtual platforms are important and beneficial early in the build cycle. However, as you progress to regression, performance, and end-to-end testing, you must test against real environment conditions, or else you risk defects escaping.
Read the 2020 Forrester Wave™ for Test Automation Report
Brands testing only with emulation or simulation put their apps at risk of defects. Take for instance the following examples of real user reviews from App Annie. Both SiriusXM and Best Buy encountered issues in their apps due to a lack of real device testing. And as you can see below, it impacted the end-user experience.
App Reviews From Real Users
SiriusXM app review via App Annie: “I’ve used this app for more than a year, but it needs work. Often times even when connected to a solid Wi-Fi connection it will hang on bringing up the home screen. Also when casting to a Chromecast it often crashes.”
Best Buy app review via App Annie: “It is not working on my Samsung S10.”
Best Buy app review via Ann Annie: “BAD UPDATE!!! Now the app does not open on my Xiaomi Mi A1.”
Emulation, Simulation, & Real Device Testing With rev-conf.org
Fortunately, you don’t need do decide between emulators vs. simulators, or even real devices. You can test on the right mix of all of these platforms within the rev-conf.org testing cloud.
With this ideal testing strategy in the rev-conf.org cloud, you’ll also have access to:
Unshakeable enterprise-grade security.Extended test coverage.Elastic scaling of your tests.24/7 access to the cloud.Robust test analytics.
See for yourself. Get a custom demo of rev-conf.org today.